A ndy Stanley , son of Charles Stanley, could be the pastor of North aim Community Church in Alpharetta, Georgia, a Southern Baptist church.

A ndy Stanley , son of Charles Stanley, could be the pastor of North aim Community Church in Alpharetta, Georgia, a Southern Baptist church.

He is among the many influential “evangelicals,” is known as a master of interaction, and is a church development guru whom shows pastors simple tips to build megachurches. He represents the quickly growing “emerging” side regarding the Southern Baptist Convention.

In 2016, he said, If you don’t go to a sizable church, you will be so stinking selfish . and don’t care about your kids” (“Andy Stanley’s Problem utilizing the Bible,” deliveredbygrace.com, Mar. 31, 2016).

In August 2016, he stated that when he had been the pope, “I would personally have got all the churches which are dying, dying, dying, dying offer their buildings and provide their funds towards the church planters” (interview with Russell Moore, ERLC meeting, Aug. 25, 2016).

Stanley holds a “tolerant” view of homosexuality. He claims he’s got no intention of pressing a Christian agenda on others ( This new Rules for enjoy, Sex and relationship ). He claims that churches must not make individuals feel just like they should leave “because they’re that is gay“Dr. Charles Stanley and Son Andy,” The Gospel Herald , Apr. 23, 2015). {In a sermon entitled “When Gracie Met Truthy,” April 15, 2012, Stanley described a few in his church who divorced when the spouse unearthed that her spouse The church allowed the homosexual couple to move to another “campus” of North Point Church and work together as a “host” team in a sermon entitled “When Gracie Met Truthy,” April 15, 2012, Stanley described a couple in his church who divorced when the wife discovered that her husband was in a sexual relationship with another man, and instead of disciplining the man. That’s not grace that is biblical it really is 2 Timothy 4:3-4 “after their very own lusts” apostasy.

Stanley minimizes the significance of the virgin birth. “Stanley’s December 3, 2016, sermon could be the many yet that is controversial. The virgin birth of Jesus Christ in his sermon, Stanley minimized the importance—if not the reality—of. ‘A lot of individuals don’t believe it, and I also realize that,’ Stanley stated. He included, ‘Maybe the idea is that they had to create some type of myth concerning the delivery of Jesus to give him street cred afterwards. Possibly that is where that came from’ ( Baptist Information Global , ‘Virgin Birth Debate Interrupts Regular ‘War on Christmas time’ Program,’ 12-21-16). Stanley then noted it is interesting that only two associated with the four gospels mention the virgin delivery, and said‘Christianity does hinge on the n’t truth and sometimes even the tales across the delivery of Jesus . It surely relies upon the resurrection of Jesus.’ Previously this current year, Stanley minimized the significance of the role Scripture performs within the life of the believer, and minimizing the significance of the virgin birth of Christ is probably the next thing in this downward trajectory. The virgin birth of Christ is very important, for without having the virgin birth, mankind will never have a Savior (the God-man) with no resurrection might have taken place! Despite what Stanley states, Christianity does hinge in the truth surrounding the delivery of Jesus Christ. Stanley’s statements are dangerous along with his conclusions are entirely unbiblical. Discerning believers must avoid people who minimize vital doctrinal truths so that they can relate genuinely to those that reject such truths into the place that is first (Matt Costella, Fundamental Evangelical Association, Dec. 23, 2016). Stanley regularly disparages the Bible.

Stanley is comparing oranges with oranges.

In ’09, he stated that preaching through the Bible verse-by-verse “isn’t exactly how you develop people. . No body into the Scripture modeled that. There is not merely one exemplory instance of that” ( The Exchange with Ed Stetzer , Mar. 5, 2009). However the preacher is commanded to “preach the phrase” (2 Ti. 4:2). Just how can he preach the Word without preaching verse-by-verse? The preacher is not providing the term whilst the Bible authors were; he could be preaching your message currently provided. A example that is good of expositorily is Nehemiah 8, in which the priests exposited the guide for the legislation. “So they read within the guide within the legislation of Jesus distinctly, and offered the feeling, and caused them to know the reading” (Neh. 8:8). Here, the priests are not offering brand new revelation; these people were maybe not composing Scripture; they certainly were preaching Scripture, plus they went verse-by-verse.